Karnataka State Road Transp. Corp vs. S. R. S. Travels & Ors. Etc. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Court 14 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-A ITEM NO.1
$\mathbf{1}$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27833-27834/2011
M/S S.R.S TRAVELS BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.T. RAJASHEKAR PROPRIETOR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION WORKERS FEDERATION NO. 6 & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
(Only SC 25787-25956/2012 to be list before Hon'ble Judge in Chamber.)
WITH
$SLP(C)$ No. 32499-32525/2011 (IV-A) (List before Hon'ble Court, vide Ld. Registrar's Order dated $01.03.2016.$ ) $SLP(C)$ No. 25787-25956/2012 (IV-A) (To list IA 41371/2017 in SLP 25787-956/2012 IA No. 41371/2017 - APPOINTMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATOR GENERAL)
Date: 11-01-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY [IN CHAMBER]
For the Parties | Mr. S.J. Amith, Adv. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mr. Krishna Kumar, Adv. | ||||||||
Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. | ||||||||
Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, AOR |
Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Ashish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Jain, Adv. Mr. Vishal Banshal, Adv.
Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand, AOR
Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Mr. D.P. Chaturvedi, learned counsel submits that since the respondent no.11, 16, 20 and 70 namely Chandrahas Ullal, P. Chandra Shekhar, Shivaram B. Hegde and G. Nagaraj are not represented, this Court should appoint the Administrator General in the State of Karnataka to represent the estate of the deceased. Alternatively, an officer of this Court may also represent the interest of the aforesaid four respondents.
Having considered the above, I deem it appropriate to permit representation of the concerned respondents through the Administrator General, as suggested by the petitioner's counsel. The Interlocutory Application is accordingly allowed. The Registry to proceed accordingly.
(JATINDER KAUR) (R.S. NARAYANAN) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
2