The Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority vs. Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan (Bavla Compound) Co-Op. Housing Society And Ors. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
5 May 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 13930-13931/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/03/2015 in CS No. 269/2014 in WP No. 1680/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay) THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARTIYA VIDYA BHAVAN (BAVLA COMPOUND) CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY AND ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) Date : 31/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dushyant A. Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Das, Adv. Ms. Swati Vaibhav, Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, A.O.R. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. For RR 1 Mr. Sanjay Kadam, Adv. Mr. Devansh Mohta, Adv. Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, A.O.R. For RR 8 Ms. Jayashree Wad, Adv. Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv. Mr. Sangram Singh Bhonsle, Adv. For M/s. J. S. Wad & Co., Advs. For RR 6 Mr. Sachin Pilot, Adv. A.O.R. (not mentioned) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following Signature Not Verified O R D E R Digitally signed by Kalyani Gupta Date: 2015.09.01 17:40:56 IST Reason: Perused the additional affidavit filed by the
PAGE NO. 1 of 2 SLP(C) Nos. 13930-13931 of 2015
\202 SLP(C) Nos. 13930-13931 of 2015
counsel for the petitioners.
additional questions of law grounds and submissions is granted.
Issue notice returnable in four weeks.
Ms. Anagha Desai, learned Advocate on Record,
Mr. Sachin Pilot, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Wad for
M/s. JS Wad & Co., Advocates, accept and waive formal notice for respondent Nos. 1,6 and 8 respectively.
Dasti service, in addition, is permitted to be effected on the remaining respondents.
Reply be filed by the respondents on whose behalf notice has been taken within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within one week thereafter.
List the matters after four weeks.
[KALYANI GUPTA] [SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
PAGE NO. 2 of 2