Power Grid Corporation Of India Limited vs. Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
15 May 2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.15
SECTION $TV-C$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.7605/2021
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-02-2021 in WP No. 10845/2020 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore]
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MADHYA PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY Respondent(s) LIMITED & ORS.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67464/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
WITH
SLP(C) No. $7607/2021$ (IV-C) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67487/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $C/C$ OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date : 27-11-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
For Petitioner(s)
| Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Shubham Arya, Adv. | |
| Ms. Poorva Saigal, Adv. | |
| Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR | |
| Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. | |
| Ms. Reeha Singh, Adv. | |
| Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Adv. | |
| Ms. Shirin Gupta, Adv. | |
| Mr. Aneesh Bajaj, Adv. | |
| Ms. Srishti Khindaria, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | |
| Mr. Prashant Singh. A.G., MP | |
| Mr. Amit Seth, Adv. | |
| ature Not Verified | Mr. Arjun Garq, AOR |
| ally signed by<br>IAL ANAND | Ms. Kriti Gupta, Adv. |
| Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Adv. | |
| Mr. Brahma Prakash Soni, Adv. | |
| Mr. Anup Jain, Adv. | |
| Mr. Udit Gupta, Adv. |
Mr. Vyom Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Pragya Gupta, Adv. Mr. Amrnath Sahoo, Adv. Ms. Nishtha Goel, Adv. Ms. Deep Shikha Kumar, Adv. For M/s. Udit Kishan And Associates, AOR Mr. Shirish K. Deshpande, AOR Ms. Rucha Pravin Mandlik, Adv. Mr. Mohit Gautam, Adv. Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Exemption Applications are allowed.
2. Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Advocate General appearing for Respondent No.1.
3. Arguments concluded.
4. Judgment reserved.
(VISHAL ANAND) (POOJA SHARMA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)