Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda vs. The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. Urban Development Department Through Its Secretary

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6198/2014 BHAWARLAL SHANKARLAL SARDA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to bring on record subsequent event and additional documents and permission to file lengthy list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 15918/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 13/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Santosh Krishnan,Adv. Ms. Garima Prashad,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A. S. Bhasme,Adv. Mr Preshit Surshe, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma,Adv. Mr Swetab Kumar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai,Adv. Mr Kunal A Cheema, Adv. Mr Amol B Karande, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that they Signature Not Verified have filed affidavit alongwith proof of service in respect Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2014.11.15 13:23:02 IST Reason: of respondent Nos. 1 and 4. Office to check and report. -2- Item No.59

Ä ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX

The ld. Counsel for respondent No.5 states that the name of the Company has changed and they have filed the vakalatnama on behalf of the new Company. It is also stated that petitioner has moved an application for amending the cause title. The name of the counsel for respondent No.5 be therefore, updated in the cause list.

Application for amendment of cause title be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.

Four weeks time is granted to respondent Nos. 6 and 7 for filing counter affidavit.

List again on 28.1.2015.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar