Sbi vs. Ramesh Prasad Nigam
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
28 Sept 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ö ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH CONMT.PET.(C) D 13201/2014 In C.A. No. 10813/2013 SBI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAMESH PRASAD NIGAM Respondent(s) Date : 10/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain,Adv. Ms. Aditi Mohan,Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the clerk of the Ld. Counsel for the appellant has given a statement on the left side of noting in file i.e. ⬠Sbeing infructuous contempt petition may not be registered and is withdrawn⬠\235 . Since the petition has not been registered as yet, therefore, the same is permitted to be withdrawn.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
MG