Tanya Mittal vs. All India Council For Technical Education Through Member Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:25 Mar 2015
CNR:SCIN010130222014

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

26 May 2014

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17833-17834/2014 TANYA MITTAL & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDUC. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and office report) Date : 25/03/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Shivanshu Singh, Adv. Mr. Arjun Garg,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr M.P.Singh, Adv. Mr. Mishra Saurabh,Adv. Mr Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Sinha,Adv. Mr. Shankar Divate,Adv. Mr D Vidyanandam, Adv. Mr. Subhash Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 has been filed. However, the same is defective. Otherwise Signature Not Verified also opportunity to file the same has already been declined Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.04.09 14:39:43 IST Reason: vide order of this Court dt.4.2.2015. Hence the same cannot be taken on record. -2- Item No.76

î ITEM NO.76 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVA

Respondent no.7 has not yet filed counter affidavit for want of pleadings. Be provided within one week. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks thereafter.

Counter affidavit of respondent no.3 is also awaited. Be filed within four weeks as last opportunity.

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed vakalatnama but the same is defective. Defects be cured within one week. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.

List again on 1.5.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(34) - 21 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 20 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 30 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 16 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 9 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 11 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 4 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 8 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 1 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 8 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 8 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 8 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 5 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 5 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 5 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 7 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 7 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 5 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 5 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 5 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 5 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 1 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 1 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 25 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 25 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(5) - 4 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 4 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 28 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 28 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 8 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 8 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data