Tanya Mittal vs. All India Council For Technical Education Through Member Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 May 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.87
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 17833-17834/2014
TANYA MITTAL & ORS
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDUC. & ORS. $Respondent(s)$ (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and <pre>office report)</pre>
Date: 04/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Shivanshu Singh, Adv.
Mr. Arjun Garq, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. M.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv. Mr. Sushendra K. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Subhash Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.5 and 6 has yet not been filed. The Ld. Counsel has requested for an adjournment. However, the same has been heavily objected by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner. The record shows that Signa we addy two opportunities have been granted to both the 12-11-4415<br>Reasor spondents but no reasonable cause has been shown as on date for the adjournment. Further adjournment is, therefore,
declined.
As far as respondent No.7 is concerned, the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is required to serve the complete set of the pleadings within a week's time to enable the Ld. Counsel for the said respondent to file counter affidavit.
Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.3 is also awaited.
List again on 25.3.2015.
(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar