Tanya Mittal vs. All India Council For Technical Education Through Member Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 May 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 17833-17834/2014
TANYA MITTAL & ORS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDUC. & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and office report)
Date : 08/09/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kunal Jeet K., Adv. Mr. Arjun Garg,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Signature Not Verified
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Sinha,Adv. Mr. Sushendra Kumar Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Subhash Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Varun Thakur, Adv.
Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 to cure the defects in the vakalatnama.
The learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6 seeks time to file their counter affidavit. Four weeks' time is granted for the said purpose.
The learned counsel for respondent No.7 has not received the complete set of the pleadings. The learned counsel for the petitioner to supply them complete set of the pleadings Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2014.09.09 16:16:14 IST Reason:
within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks of receipt of the complete set of the pleadings.
The learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service on respondent No.3. Notice be sent through the District Court in addition to the normal process.
Service is complete on respondent Nos.4, 8, 9 and 18 but no one has put in appearance.
List again on 28.11.2014.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar