Maman @ Maman Ram vs. State Of Haryana Through Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Ö ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28384/2014 JAI GOPAL AND ORS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)
(with office report)
Date : 30/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Service in respect of respondent Nos. 1 & 2 is incomplete. It appears from the office report that Respondent No.1 is the State of Haryana and the respondent No.2 is the State Agency. Therefore, Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve notice on the Ld.Standing Counsel for the State of Haryana and file proof. Liberty is granted to Ld.counsel for the respondent No.3 to file the counter affidavit within four weeks. List the matter again on 07.10.2015.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.08.03
15:05:16 IST Reason: Registrar SB
(SURAJIT DEY)