Maman @ Maman Ram vs. State Of Haryana Through Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ¨ | ITEM NO.63 | REGISTRAR COURT. 2 | SECTION IVB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | |||
| BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA | ||||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) | No(s).<br>28384/2014 | |||
| JAI GOPAL AND ORS | Petitioner(s) | |||
| VERSUS | ||||
| STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS | Respondent(s) | |||
| (with office report) |
Date : 09/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. R. C. Kaushik,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Respondent No. 3 has already filed the counter affidavit as gets revealed from the perusal of the office report. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of Haryana. Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj List again on 30.7.2015. Date: 2015.04.11 06:47:21 CEST Reason:
(M K HANJURA) Registrar