Maman @ Maman Ram vs. State Of Haryana Through Collector

ITEM NO.139 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1132-1133/2015 CHANDER KALA @ CHANDER KALNA ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. $1139/2015$ (With appln.(s) for deletion of proforma respondents and Office Report) Date: 27/02/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Tanya Swarup, Adv. Mr. K. K. Mohan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

SLP(C) No. $1132-1133/2015$

Mr. B.K. Satija, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama. The Learned counsel has stated that the petitioners have not provided the copies of the pleadings to him. The learned counsel for petitioners is directed to provide the copies of the pleadings to the learned counsel within a weeks' time Signal proof. The respondent shall file the Counter Affidavit within a period of four weeks, thereafter.

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the other respondents.

Contd...2/-

SLP(C) No. 1139/2015

Mr. B.K. Satija, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama. The Learned counsel has stated that the petitioners have not provided the copies of the pleadings to him. The learned counsel for petitioners is directed to provide the copies of the pleadings to the learned counsel within a weeks' time and file proof. The respondent shall file the Counter Affidavit within a period of four weeks, thereafter.

Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent nos. 3 and 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks.

The office report states that the respondent nos. 5 to 50 have been deleted from the array of parties vide order dated 25.02.2015 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.

List again on 08.05.2015.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

PS