Maman @ Maman Ram vs. State Of Haryana Through Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7221-7222/2015 KRISHAN KUMAR AND ORS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Respondent(s)
(with office report)
WITH SLP(C) No. 10044-10045/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 7524-7525/2015 (With Office Report)
Date : 08/04/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Bilal Khan,Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) Nos. 7221-7222/2015
Four weeks time, as last chance is given to both the Digitally signed by respondents to file the counter affidavit. Madhu Grover Date: 2016.04.08 16:47:37 SCT Reason: Signature Not Verified
SLP(C) Nos. 10044-10045/2015
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the both the respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of Haryana.
List again on 7.7.2016.
SLP(C) Nos.7524-7525/2015
The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on both the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
MG