REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION TVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).34697-34699/2014

SANTOSH AND ORS ETC

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

(with office report)

WITH SLP(C) No. $7221-7222/2015$ (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $10044-10045/2015$ (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $13593-13594/2015$ (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $934-941/2015$ (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $7524-7525/2015$ (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $7224-7225/2015$ (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 14098/2015 (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. $10050-10051/2015$ Signally string (%) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for detion of the name of respondent and Office Report)

Date: 14/12/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Parv K. Garq, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Rajat Verma,Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Vikram Singh,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Bhawati Anukampa,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv.

Mr. Deepak Thukral,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 34697-34699/2014

The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the respondents has already filed the counter affidavit. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

SLP(C) Nos. 7224-7225, 13593-13594 and 14098/2015

The office report indicates service of notice is complete on the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.

SLP(C) No. 934-941/2015

The office report indicates that although by order dated 27.10.2015 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the petitioners to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondents, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

However, Ld. Counsel has appeared on behalf of all the respondents and has stated that he has already filed the counter affidavit on behalf of all the respondents. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. In case, the counter affidavit seems to have been filed in that event the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per the rules. In case of default, process the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for future directions.

SLP(C) Nos. 7221-7222 and 10050-10051/2015

Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

The office report states that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for deletion of respondent No.3 from the array of the parties. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 10044-10045/2015

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks.

SLP(C) No. 7524-7525/2015

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.1.

Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.

List again on 18.2.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG