Kerala State Co Operative Employees Pension Fund vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization And Ors Etc

COURT NO.4

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 6575/2014

STATE OF KERALA

Appellant(s)

Respondent(s)

VERSUS

C.D. UDAYAKUMAR. & ORS.

([FOR DISPOSAL] )

WITH

C.A. No. 7929/2014 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4620-4623/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4588-4591/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4617-4619/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4609-4612/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4615-4616/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4593-4596/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4604-4606/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 4600-4603/2022 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 19255/2017 (XI-A)

$SLP(C)$ No. 31514/2017 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) C.A. No. 2666/2015 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7969-7972/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 6576-6579/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 6580-6583/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 6584-6587/2014 (XI-A)

Signature $\text{Not }$ VARed No. 6588-6591/2014 (XI-A)

S.A. No. 7963/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7973/2014 (XI-A)

• C.A. No. 7964/2014 (XI-A)
• C.A. No. 7978-7980/2014 (XI-A)
• C.A. No. 7974/2014 (XI-A)
• C.A. No. 7965-7968/2014 (XI-A)
• C.A. No. 7975-7977/2014 (XI-A)
• SLP(C) No. 1714/2018 (XI-A)
• Date : 24-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.
• CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
• For Parties Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Adv. Mr. P. V. Surendranath, Sr. Adv. Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, AOR Mr. Subhash Chandran K. R., Adv. Mr. Sawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. P. V. Dinesh, AOR Mr. Rahul Raj Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ashwini Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Bineesh K., Adv. Mr. Sudhir, Adv. Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR Ms. Arti Singh, AOR Ms. Sonakshi S. Ravinder, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dewivedi, Adv. Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Ms. Niveditha R. Menon, Adv. Mr. Aditya Verma, Adv. Dr. P. George Giri, AOR Ms. Jasmin Kurian Giri, Adv. Mr. Shaji Sebastian, Adv. Mr. Linto K. B., Adv. Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.a., AOR

Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Ms. Anjani Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Arun Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr. P. A. Noor Muhamed, AOR Ms. Shakun Sharma, AOR Mr. Sarthak Arora, Adv. Ms. Nidhi, AOR Ms. V. P. Seemanthini, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr. M. P. Vinod, AOR Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. Ram Lal Roy, AOR Ms. Anukriti Sugam, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, AOR Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Ms. Akansha Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Nand Ram, Adv. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, AOR Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned counsel for the appellant-State submits that the final figure which emerges is that there are 333 persons identified. Benefits has thus been extended to another set of respondents as was denied earlier.

In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the appellant states that the scheme can be worked out for the aforesaid number

3

of persons.

We are inclined to dispose of the matters in terms as aforesaid.

If any eligible person still, who is before the Court is left out, they may also approach the appellant-State and if it falls within the parameters we are sure the appellant-State will work out for those number of people also which are said to be in maximum two digit figures.

The scheme which has now been accepted in terms of the present order will naturally be in super-session of the impugned orders.

Liberty is granted to move in case of difficulty.

(RASHMI DHYANI PANT) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER