The State Of Kerala Kerala State Cooperative Employees Pension Board Secretary vs. Employees Provident Fund Organization And Ors Etc Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6575/2014 STATE OF KERALA Appellant(s) VERSUS C.D. UDAYAKUMAR & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ ([FOR DIRECTIONS] IA NO. 2/2013 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION) WITH C.A. No. 7929/2014 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4620-4623/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4588-4591/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4617-4619/2022 (XI-A) C.A. No. 7969-7972/2014 (XI-A) C.A. No. 2666/2015 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 19255/2017 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4604-4606/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4609-4612/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4615-4616/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4600-4603/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 4593-4596/2022 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 31514/2017 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION) C.A. No. 6576-6579/2014 (XI-A) FOR ON IA 13-16/2017 Igna MONOGERATION IMPLEADMENT <table><tbody>Image: Second stateIntervention/IMPLEADMENT)Image: Second stateIntervention/IMPLEADMENT)</tbody> $\frac{349.54}{15}$ C.A. No. 6580-6583/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 6584-6587/2014 (XI-A)

(IA 180374/2019- INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)

C.A. No. 6588-6591/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7963/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7974/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7973/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7964/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7978-7980/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7965-7968/2014 (XI-A)

C.A. No. 7975-7977/2014 (XI-A)

SLP(C) No. 1714/2018 (XI-A)

Date : 15-07-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

For Appellant(s)	Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR<br>Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv.<br>Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Adv.
	Mr. P.V. Surendra Nath, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Subhash Chandran K.R., Adv.<br>Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, AOR<br>Ms. Lekha Sudhakaran, Adv.<br>Mr. Sanan Shukla, Adv.
For Appellant(s)/<br>Petitioner(s)/<br>Respondent(s)	Mr. P.V. Dinesh, AOR<br>Mr.Mr. Ashwini Kumar Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Bineesh K., Adv.
For Respondent(s)	Ms. V.P. Seemanthini, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mohammed Sadique T.A., AOR<br>Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv.<br>Mr. Ali, Anvar, Adv.
	Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR<br>Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv.<br>Ms. Anjani Kumar Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Arun Gopalan Nair, Adv.
	Mr. P.A. Noor Muhamed, AOR

Ms. Mary Mitzy, Adv. Ms. Shakun Sharma, AOR Mr. Sarthak Arora, Adv. Ms. Nidhi, AOR Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mr. Ravi Sagar, Adv. Mr. Alok K Prasad, Adv. Mr. Jaison V.J., Adv. Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR Mr. Ravi Sagar, Adv. Mr. Alok K Prasad, Adv. Mr. Kochurani C.J., Adv., Adv. Mr. James P. Thomas, AOR Ms. Arti Singh, AOR Mr. K. Rajeev, AOR Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR Dr. P. George Giri, AOR Ms. Jasmin Kurian, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., AOR Mr. M.P. Vinod, AOR Ms. Resmitha R. Chandran, AOR Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Mr. Ram Lal Roy, AOR Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, AOR Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Akansha Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, AOR Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Ms. Puspita Basak, Adv. Mr. T.L.V. Thomas, Sr. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Dr. Vivek Sharma, Adv.

3

Mr. Amit Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

IA No. 2/2013 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6575/2014

The application for intervention is allowed.

IA 13/2017-IMPLEADMENT AND IA No. 173063/2018 – IMPLEADMENT IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6576-6579/2014, IA 180374/2019- INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IN C.A. Nos. 6584-6587/2014

The applicants are permitted to intervene.

The applications stand disposed of.

-----

The matter has made some progress and according to learned counsel for the State they have finally identified 285 people. This is a position which is acceptable to certain number of people.

We would have been inclined to work out a scheme for these 285 people but learned counsel for the State submits that the State must know the final number as the working of the scheme would be dependent on the total number of persons who would be the beneficiaries under the scheme. It appears that some of the people are still seeking to dispute the position.

In view of the aforesaid contour of the controversy left, list on 24.08.2022 for disposal in admission matters.

Learned counsel for the State to file a short synopsis running into not more than 2 pages within 10 days from today. If any of the parties dispute the position, they may in turn file synopsis explaining the position within two days thereafter.

[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)