Dr. Neha Gupta vs. The State Of Rajasthan State Of Rajasthan . Through The Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
22 Apr 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
MATTER FOR : 01.07.2015 COURT NO. ITEM NO.
SECTION-XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 8769-70 WITH , 9457/15, 9506/15, 9346 and 12711 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 4 (In SLP NO. 9457/15) (Application for deleting the name of respondent) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 4 (In SLP NO. 9506/15) (Application for deleting the name of respondent)
WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
MAHATMA GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S)
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above-mentioned were listed before Hon'ble court on
15.05.2015 when the court was pleased to pass the following order:-
"In modification of order dated 11th May, 2015, we clarify and further direct that result of students concerned with all these petitions shall be declared but the said result shall be subject to final result of these petitions.
It is further directed that the result of all other similarly situated students shall also be declared.
List the matters on 1st July, 2015."
S.L.P. (C) NO. 8769-70/2015
It is submitted that there are ten respondents (Common in both the SLPs). M/s P. K. Jain, Gaurav Sharma, Bimlesh Kumar Singh and Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocates have entered appearance on behalf of Dr. Yogendra Singh Gurjar, Medical Council of India, University Grants Commission and State of Rajsthan but they have not filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents through dasti notice but no one has entered appearance so far.
Service is complete.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 9457/2015
It is submitted that there are twenty-two respondents in the matter. M/s Gaurav Sharma, Bimlesh Kumar singh and Mohan Pandey, Advocates, have entered appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 20 but they have not filed counter affidavit on behalf of the said respondents so far. Service of notice is complete on Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 7 to 12 through dasti notice but no one has entered appearance. Respondent No. 13 has refused to receive the notice.
It is further submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for deleting the name of respondent Nos. 14 to 22 which is registered as I. A. No. 4. Copy of the same has been included in Paper-Books.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 9506/2015
It is submitted that there are ninteen respondents in the matter. M/s Gaurav Sharma, Bimlesh Kumar singh and Mohan Pandey, Advocates, have entered appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 19 but they have not filed counter affidavit on behalf of the said Respondents so far. Service of notice is complete on Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, 7 to 12 through dasti notice but no one has entered appearance. Respondent No. 13 has refused to receive the notice.
It is further submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for deleting the name of respondent Nos. 14 to 19 which is registered as I. A. No. 4. Copy of the same has been included in Paper-Books.
S.L.P. (C) NO. 9346/2015
It is submitted that there are twenty-four respondents in the matter. M/s Gaurav Sharma, Bimlesh Kumar singh and Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocates, have entered appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 5, 6 and 1 but they have not filed counter affidavit on behalf of the said respondents so far. The Counsel for the petitioner has filed affidavit alongwith proof of service as dasti notice after effecting service on respondent No. 1 to 13, 18 & 22. It is also stated in affidavit that respondent Nos. 14 to 17, 19 to 21, 23 and 24 have refused to receive the notice as the said notice was sent by way of speed post.
SLP (C) NO. 12711 OF 2015
It is submitted that pusuant to Court's Order dated 27.04.2015 show cause notice was issued on 5.05.2015 to Respondent No. 3 through Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate and Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 to 24 by Registered A.D. post. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers have been received back so far.
It is futher submitted that vide Court's Order dated 11.05.2015, counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps to complete service of notice upon the unserved respondents.
Service is incomplete.
The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Ms. Arti Gupta, Adv. Mr. P. K. Jain, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1/lk/fresh OR