Bande Satyanarayana Murthy (Since Dead) vs. Mummidi Brahmandam
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
12 Jan 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT NO.: 1
LISTED ON : 17.08.2016 ITEM NO. : 40
SECTION– XII A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 1442 OF 2015.
WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
BANDE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY (DEAD) ...PETITIONER -VERSUS-
MUMMIDI SREERAMULU (DIED) PER LRS. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matter above-mentioned was listed before the Registrar Court on 3 rd
May, 2016, when the following order was passed:-
"SLP against respondent Nos.1 to 6, 8 to 23, 25 to 39 and 42 to 78 has already been dismissed. Opportunity for respondent Nos.7, 24 and 41 to file the counter affidavit has already been declined. Defects in the application for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner be cured within two weeks. Registry to process thereafter. Registry to submit report regarding the status of respondent No.40 in the next office report. List again on 17.8.2016."
It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has not cured the defects in application for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner so far.
It is further submitted that neither A. D. Card nor unserved registered cover has been received back from the Respondent No.40 so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. V.R. Anumolu, Advocate has filed vakalatnama and appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 7, 24, 41 and 71 and Opportunity of filing counter-affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos. 7, 24, 41 & 71 declined vide Ld. Registrar's Order dated 22nd July, 2015.
It is further submitted that Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Counsel for the Petitioner has on 29th April, 2016 filed application for substituted service for effecting service in respect of Respondent Nos. 3, 5, 6, 16, 19, 21, 27 to 29, 32 to 39, 42, 46 to 50, 52 to 56, 58 to 64, 67 to 72 and 74 whereas the SLP quo above-said Respondent has been dismissed vide the Hon'ble Court's order dated 4 th April, 2016 and affidavit annexed with application is unsigned.
Service is not complete on all Respondents except Respondent Nos. 7, 24, 41 and 71.
The aforesaid matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report.
Dated this, the 16th day of August, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:-
-
Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Advocate, 18, New Lawyer's Chambers
-
Mr. V. R. Anumolu, Advocate, 53, Supreme Enclave Mayur Vihar Ph-I