Amulya Awinash Dahanukar vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.8
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12677/2020 AMULYA AWINASH DAHANUKAR & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
Date: 10-07-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR [IN CHAMBER]
| For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Aditya Kumar, Adv. | |
| Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Mr. Gajanan N Tirthkar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chouhan, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR
Mr. Yuvraj Gaikwad, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite all orts made service of notice is not complete on respondent no.4
to respondent no.6.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would effect service of notice on the said respondents through substituted service and mainly through paper publication and seeks two weeks' time to file necessary application in this regard.
Acceding to his request two weeks time is granted, subject to the condition that if the application is not filed within two weeks from today the petition shall stand dismissed against respondent nos.4 to respondent no.6 automatically.
(KAVITA PAHUJA) (POONAM VAID)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)