The Hongkong And Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd vs. Unimark Remedies Ltd.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
21 Apr 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO(S). 12538/2015 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 09/03/2015 IN WPC NO. 2161/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI) THE HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LTD. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS M/S UNIMARK REMEDIES LTD. AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 22/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing in the mentioning board today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Yadav, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Adv. Mrs. Priya Puri, Adv. Mr. Vatsala Kak Panda, Adv. Mr. Ranjay Dubey, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A mention has been made for a short adjournment. Issue notice to the Officer of the petitio ner -Company who has sworn the affidavit of urgency to explain as to how the pendency of the proceedings under Section 391 Signature Not Verified of the Companies Act, 1956 before the Bombay High Court Digitally signed by Vinod Lakhina Date: 2015.04.23 would be a justification for taking up this matter out of 16:16:30 IST Reason: Page No.1 of 2 turn particularly as the present matter relates to the entitlement of the petitioner to a decree on admission under Order XII rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure,
\210 ITEM NO.601 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV
The matter will be heard after the ensuing summer
vacation.
[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Page No.2 of 2