Rakesh Kumar Rai vs. Rajendra Agr. University

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble G.N. Ray
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:13 Apr 2006
CNR:SCIN010125141994

AI Summary

This Supreme Court order addresses interlocutory applications within a long-standing Special Leave Petition (Civil) dating back to 1995, involving Upendra Singh and Rajendra Agr. University. The Court's brief ruling notes the withdrawal of these applications, leading to their dismissal, indicating a procedural closure for these specific interim matters.

Ratio Decidendi:
The applications were dismissed by the Supreme Court because the petitioners opted to withdraw them.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:5760/1995
Case Type:Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)
Case Sub-Type:SLP - General
Secondary Case Numbers:IA No.5, I.A. Nos.2-9, S.L.P.(C) Nos.8831-8838/1995
Order Date:2006-04-13
Filing Year:1995
Court:Supreme Court of India
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble Arijit Pasayat, Hon'ble S.H. Kapadia

Petitioner's Counsel

Priya Hingorani
Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

M/S. Hingorani & Associates

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

This Record of Proceedings pertains to Interlocutory Application No. 5 within Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 5760/1995, alongside I.A. Nos. 2-9 in S.L.P.(C) Nos. 8831-8838/1995. The primary petitioners are Upendra Singh & Ors., and the respondents are Rajendra Agr. University & Ors. The applications were listed for hearing before a bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia on April 13, 2006. Counsel Ms. Priya Hingorani appeared for the petitioners. Following the hearing, the Court issued a brief order dismissing all the applications as withdrawn.

Timeline of Events

1995

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 5760/1995 and 8831-8838/1995 filed in Supreme Court.

2006-04-13

Interlocutory applications in the said SLPs called on for hearing.

2006-04-13

Applications dismissed as withdrawn by the Supreme Court.

Court's Reasoning

The Court's decision to dismiss the applications was based solely on the fact that the parties themselves chose to withdraw them. The order does not contain any independent reasoning or judicial pronouncements on the merits of the applications or the underlying case.

Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Disposed
Disposition Outcome:Withdrawn

Specific Directions

  1. 1.The applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This is a brief procedural order dismissing applications as withdrawn, without any substantive discussion of law or facts. It does not lay down any legal principle or interpretation.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Understand the implications and proper procedure for withdrawing interlocutory applications during a Supreme Court hearing.
2.Ensure clear instructions from clients are in place for procedural decisions like withdrawal of applications.
3.Be mindful that even procedural orders can indicate the status and progress of a larger, long-standing case.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court Procedural Order for Special Leave Petition WithdrawalInterlocutory Application Dismissal by Consent in Supreme CourtCase Management in Civil Appeals by India Supreme CourtRole of Advocates in Withdrawing Applications During HearingRecord of Proceedings Reflecting Application Status Update

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

7 Apr 1995

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IA No.5 in

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5760/1995

UPENDRA SINGH & ORS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAJENDRA AGR. UNIVERSITY & ORS Respondent(s)

(For directions)

WITH

I.A. Nos.2-9 in S.L.P.(C) Nos.8831-8838/1995 (For directions)

Date: 13/04/2006 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Priya Hingorani,Adv. for M/S. Hingorani & Associates

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

(Neena Verma) (Vijay Aggarwal)

Court Master Court Master