Mathammal Christian Charitable Trust Etc vs. President& Ors.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.48 | REGISTRAR COURT.2 | SECTION IIIA | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | O F<br>I N D I A | ||
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS | ||||
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20031/2012 | ||||
ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENT COIMBATORE | Petitioner(s) | |||
VERSUS | ||||
THE PRESIDENT,K.VELLAKULAM & ANR. | Respondent(s) | |||
(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing c/c of the<br>impugned Judgment and prayer for interim relief and office report )) | ||||
WITH SLP(C) NO. 20032 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38073 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38074-38076 of 2012<br>SLP(C) NO. 38077-38078 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38079 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38080 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38081 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38082-38084 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38085-38088 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38089-38090 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38091-38097 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38098-38109 of 2012<br>(With office report)<br>SLP(C) NO. 38110 of 2012<br>(With office report) | (With prayer for interim relief and office report) | |||
Date: 30/04/2013 | This Petition was called on for hearing today. | |||
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. V. Ramasubramanian,Adv. | 2/- | ||
Item No.48 | : 2 : | |||
Mr. V.N. Raghupathy,Adv.<br>Mr. Parivesh Singh,Adv. | ||||
Mr. Vijay Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr. B. Ragunath,Adv. | ||||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv.<br>Mr. A. Santha Kumaran,Adv. |
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C)No.38074-38076/2012 respondent No.1 alone remains to be served. However, the above respondent has filed Vakalatnama in the other cases through Mr. Yogesh Kanna, advocate. Hence, Ld. counsel for the petitioner herein seeks service of notice on respondent No.1 on the above counsel. Permitted. Serve notice and file proof. Respondent No. 1 may file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.
Service is incomplete in SLP(C)No.38085-88/2012 and 38079/2012. It is submitted that respondent No.2 in SLP(C)No.38085-88/2012 is common respondent who has been served in other connected cases. Office to verify whether respondent in the above case has been served in any other connected case so that service can be deemed as complete.
In SLP(C)No.38079/2012 respondent No.3 appears to be served. Office to verify whether respondent No.3 is common in other cases so that service can be deemed complete against respondent No.3 also. All the served respondents are granted four weeks time as a last chance for filing counter affidavit.
List the matters on 30.7.2013.
(SUNIL THOMAS) | |||
---|---|---|---|
s | Registrar |