Gurdev Singh (D) Through Lrs vs. The State Of Haryana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Administrative Order
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List Before Chamber
Listed On:
11 Mar 2023
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.7
COURT NO.5 $\sim$
SECTION IV-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) .............................. Diary No(s).43108/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-01-2022 in RFA No.2330/2017, RFA No.2527/2017, RFA No.645/2020 and RFA No.702/2020 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
RAVINDER KAUR
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
Respondent $(s)$
No.236695/2023-CONDONATION $\overline{0}$ F $(IA)$ DELAY $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ FTI TNG and $TA$ No.236702/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.236698/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and $IA$ No.236700/2023-SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT and IA No.236704/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.236701/2023-APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT)
Date: 28-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Honey Verma, Adv. Mr. Vineet, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D F R
- The application for permission to file the Special Leave Petition is allowed.
Delay in filing the application for setting aside $\overline{\mathbf{a}}$ batement is condoned. Consequently, the application for setting aside abatement and the application for substitution are allowed.
$\overline{3}$ . Amended memo of parties be filed accordingly. 4. Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing the Special Leave Petition as well as on the Special Leave Petition.
5. Tag with SLP(C)Nos.10872-10936 of 2022.
6. Meanwhile, the recovery notices alleged to have been issued to the petitioner/land-owner be not given effect to.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)