Union Of India Department Of Revenue Through Its Secretary Department Of Revenue vs. Future Gaming Solutions India Pvt Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 1
SECTION III
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18565/2014
UOI & ORS
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S FUTURE GAMING SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD & ANR.Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. $30629/2014$ <pre>(With Interim Relief)</pre> $SLP(C)$ No. 14111/2015 <pre>(With Interim Relief)</pre> Date: 12/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Meenesh Kr. Dubey, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. M. P. Devanath, Adv. Mr. Harsh Makhija, Adv. Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co., Adv. Mr. Manish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Arjun Garg, Adv. Mr. Tishampati Sen, Adv. Mr. Gautam Narayan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
SLP(C) No. $18565/2014$
SignatureNot Verified Despite two opportunities having been granted, respondent 16.39 ANS. 2 has not filed counter affidavit. As such, further<br>Reese ANS. 2 opportunity is declined.
Respondent No.1 has filed the counter affidavit.
ITEM NO.24
The matter stands complete.
Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules, alongwith the connected matters.
SLP(C) No. 30629/2014
Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not filed the counter affidavit, despite two opportunities having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined.
The matter stands complete.
Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules, alongwith the connected matters.
SLP(C) No. 14111/2015
The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Yusuf Khan has entered appearance for respondent No.2. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks. Petitioner to provide the complete set of the pleadings to respondent No.2 within one week.
Respondent No.1 has not filed the counter affidavit, despite two opportunities having been granted. As such, further opportunity is declined.
List again on 14.3.2016.
(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar