Karam Singh(D) By Lrs vs. State Of Punjab Through Land Acquisition Collector Urban Estate

Ê ITEM NO.103 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

Civil Appeal No(s). 6133/2010

GURDEV SINGH & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

PUNJAB STATE Respondent(s)

(with office report)

Date : 15/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

M/s. Temple Law Firm,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the appellants has failed to file the statement of case, although he has been notified to do so by letter dated 29.05.2012 of this Registry. Service is complete on the respondent, but no one has entered appeared on his behalf. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to Signature Not Verified

file any further statement of case. Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.04.17 10:25:33 IST Reason:

ITEM NO.103 -2-

..........2

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar