Karam Singh(D) By Lrs vs. State Of Punjab Through Land Acquisition Collector Urban Estate

R ITEM NO.103 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 6127-6132/2010 KARAM SINGH(D) BY LRS.ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6134/2010 (With Office Report) Date : 25/03/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) M/s. Temple Law Firm,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. C. K. Sucharita,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellants and the Ld.counsel for the respondent have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 29.05.2012 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Su preme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special lea ve to Signature Not Verified appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.03.27 file 11:18:54 IST Reason: any further statement of case. The order further provide s ......2 ITEM NO.103 -2 that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar