Bohatie Devi (Dead) vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble C.T. Ravikumar
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Leave Granted / Rule NISI / Appeal Admitted, Heard & Reserved
Listed On:
13 Apr 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
70493/2021,70494/2021,146521/2021,129516/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.4 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4394/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-11-2020 in CRLMWP No. 7093/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
BOHATIE DEVI (DEAD) THRU LR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 70493/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 146521/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 70494/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. & IA No. 129516/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 7708/2021 (II) IA No. 129767/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT & IA No. 129768/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 13-04-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
| For Parties: | Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms. Deepali, Adv.<br>Mr. Pulak Bagchi, Adv.<br>Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR |
|---|---|
| Mr. S Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv.<br>Mr. R Sudhakaran, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhaya Nath Das, Adv.<br>Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR | |
| Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Sandeep Sinhmar, Adv.<br>Mr. Satish Hooda, Adv.<br>Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR |
Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Chowdhari, Adv. Mr. K.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. Kanishk Chowdhari, Adv. Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, A.A.G. Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Sengar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We have heard Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Nagamuthu & Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, learned Senior Advocates, appearing for respondent Nos.8 and 11 in SLP (Crl.) No. 4394/2021.
Leave granted.
Arguments concluded.
Judgment reserved
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR