Edigela Gangaram vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh High Court Public Prosecutor
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Stage:
Criminal Matters : Others
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
31 Oct 2018
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.960 OF 2011
EDIGELA GANGARAM … APPELLANT
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH … RESPONDENT
O R D E R
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.11.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.222 of 2006 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has already undergone 15 years of actual sentence. It is surprising that even though the appellant has undergone 15 years of actual sentence, the State has not considered the case of the appellant for premature release, nor the appellant has made any representation to the State.
Taking into consideration the aforesaid fact, we direct the appellant to make a representation to the Government of Telangana seeking remission in accordance with the Rules applicable to the State of Telangana. Upon making such representation by the appellant, the Government of Telangana is Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2018.11.03 13:06:38 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
directed to consider the same within a period of two months from the date of making such representation, and release the appellant, in accordance with the Remission Rules of the Government of Telangana, if not required in any other case.
With the aforesaid observations, without going into the merits of the case, we dispose of this appeal.
However, if the case of the appellant is not considered by the Government of Telangana within the aforesaid period or if the Government of Telangana rejects the representation of the appellant, the appellant is at liberty to make an application before this Court for restoration of the appeal.
......................J. (N.V.RAMANA)
......................J. (MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR)
NEW DELHI; OCTOBER 31, 2018. ITEM NO.107 COURT NO.6 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Criminal Appeal No(s).960/2011
EDIGELA GANGARAM Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Respondent(s)
Date : 31-10-2018 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
- For Appellant(s) Mr.V.Shekhar, Sr.Adv. Mr.Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Adv. Mr.Prithviraj Singh, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Ms.Bina Madhavan, Ad. Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr.D.Mahesh Babu, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RAJ RANI NEGI) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)