Union Of India vs. Ami Lal Alias Amin Lal (Since Deceased) Through Lrs
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List On (Date) [22-04-2025]
Listed On:
27 Feb 2025
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.56 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION IV-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 12064-12066/2024
UNION OF INDIA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMI LAL ALIAS AMIN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
Date: 27-02-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, AOR Ms. Pragva Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Drishti Saraf, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No. 12064-12066/2024
SLP(C) No. 12064-12065/2024
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed an application seeking Stituted service with regard to Respondent No. 1.1. The same is as towed. Proof of publication be filed within a period of four weeks.
Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 1.2 to 1.4 but none has entered appearance.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed an application seeking substituted service on behalf of said respondents as well. Since service is now complete, an application seeking substituted service is not required for the said respondents and the same stands infructuous.
Only memo of appearance has been filed with regard to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit has not been filed despite last opportunity. Hence, further opportunity to file counter affidavit is declined.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed an application seeking substituted service on respondent No. 3 as well. Since service is now complete on respondent No.3, application seeking substituted service is not required for the said respondent and the same stands infructuous.
SLP(C) No. 12066/2024
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed an application seeking substituted service with regard to Respondent Nos. 2.2 to 2.6. The same is allowed. Proof of publication be filed within a period of four weeks.
Service is complete on Respondent Nos. 1, 2.1 but none has entered appearance. Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed an application seeking substituted service on said respondent Nos. 1 and 2.1 also. Since service is now complete, an application seeking substituted service is not required for the said respondents and the same stands infructuous.
Only memo of appearance has been filed with regard to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit has not been filed despite last opportunity. Hence, further opportunity to file counter affidavit is declined.
2
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed an application seeking substituted service on respondent No. 4 as well. Since service is now complete on respondent No.4, application seeking substituted service is not required for the said respondent and the same stands infructuous.
List again on 22.4.2025.
SUJATA SINGH Registrar
MG
3