Vaishali (Minor) (Through Next Friend Mrs. Sita Devi) vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble K.M. Joseph, Hon'ble B.V. Nagarathna
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Stay/Status quo [interim order to continue till next date of hearing], IA Allowed [59253/2023], List On (Date) [11-04-2023], Top of the board
Listed On:
24 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
14989/2023,20937/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NOS. 14 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 12350/2022
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 19-04-2022 in LPA No. 271/2022 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)
VAISHALI (MINOR) (THROUGH NEXT FRIEND MRS. SITA DEVI) & ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 20937/2023 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 14989/2023 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)
- Date : 24-03-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Aman Panwar, Adv.<br>Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv.<br>Mr. Keshav Khandelwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Harsh, Adv.<br>Mr. Shivam Singh Baghel, Adv.<br>Mr. Kapish Seth, Adv.<br>Mr. Suman Kani, Adv.<br>Mr. Akash Panwar, Adv.<br>Mr. Aaditya Kaul, Adv.<br>Mr. Nitin Saluja, AOR |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR<br>Mr. Sanjay Jain, A.S.G.<br>Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv.<br>Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Navanjay Mahapatra, Adv. |
| Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Omakar, Adv.<br>Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. G.G. Kashyap, Adv.<br>Ms. Apoorva P., Adv.<br>Mr. Rose Verma, Adv. |
Ms. T. Archana, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
I.A. No. 59253 of 2023, application for intervention is allowed.
Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has made reference in the short counter affidavit to certain documents produced in support of the claims of the petitioners but in the rejoinder affidavit, it has been averred that there are other documents which would establish that the petitioners were residing from a much earlier date.
Learned ASG, Mr. Sanjay Jain, will get definite instructions about the same and will be free to file additional counter affidavit, if need arises. Respondents are permitted to file additional documents.
List on 11.04.2023 as Item No. 1.
(NITIN TALREJA) (RENU KAPOOR)
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR