Biju Patnaik University Of Technology vs. Dharitri Das
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:13 May 2011
CNR:SCIN010123092012
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ú | 1 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEM NO.51 | COURT NO.3 | SECTION IVA | ||||||||
S U P R E M E | C O U R T | O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | |||||||
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).5400/2011 | ||||||||||
(From the judgement and order dated 02/02/2011<br>315/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT GWALIOR) | in | WP | No. | |||||||
RAJEEV GANDHI PROUDYOGIKI VISHWAVIDYALAY | Petitioner(s) | |||||||||
VERSUS | ||||||||||
BHARTIYA VIDYA MANDIR SHIKSHA SAMITI &ORS. | Respondent(s) | |||||||||
(With appln(s) for modification, direction and office report) | ||||||||||
WITH SLP(C) NO. 8443 of 2011 | (With appln.(s) for impleadment and office report) | |||||||||
Date: 13/05/2011<br>today. | These Petitions were called on for hearing | |||||||||
CORAM : | ||||||||||
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK | ||||||||||
For Petitioner(s) | ||||||||||
Mr. Niraj Sharma,Adv. | ||||||||||
Mr. Ashok Mathur,aDV. | ||||||||||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Ashok Mathur,Adv. | |||||||||
Mr. Naveen R. Nath ,Adv.<br>Mrs. Lalit Mohini Bhat,Adv.<br>Mr. A. Dasaratha,Adv. | ||||||||||
(For AICTE) | Mr. Amitesh Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr. Navin Prakash,Adv. | |||||||||
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | ||||||||||
Learned | counsel | for | the | Council | of | |||||
Architecture states that it has filed a counter | ||||||||||
in SLP(C)No.8443/2011 but the Registry has not | ||||||||||
received | it<br>as | it<br>is<br>2 | not<br>a | party | in | that | ||||
petition. | He | also | states | that | Council | of | ||||
Architecture | is | respondent | No.4 | in | the | |||||
connected<br>SLP(C)No.5400/2011 | and | the | counter | |||||||
filed in that petition may be treated as common | ||||||||||
counter | for | SLP(C)No. | 8443/2011 | and | ||||||
SLP(C)No.5400/2011. |
The petitioner University is directed to declare the first semester examination (Dec.2010) results of the students of the first respondent college and permit them to take the second semester examination. It is made clear this permission will not create any equities in favour of the students and ultimately, if it is found that the permission of the Council is Architecture is required, their admissions are liable to be treated as null and void.
List after summer vacation.
(O.P. Sharma) ( M.S.Negi ) Court Master Court Master
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search
Same Parties
Biju Patnaik University Of Technology vs Dharitri DasBiju Patnaik University Of TechnologyDharitri DasAjay Binay Institute Of Technology Piloo Mody College Of Architecture DirectorCouncil Of Architecture RegistrarThe State Of Odisha Industries Department SecretaryThe State Of Odisha Orissa Joint Entrance Examination 2010 (Ojee 2010) ChairmanThe State Of Odisha Policy Planning Body, Directorate Of Technical Education And Training Member Secretary
Judges
Search in District Courts Data
Biju Patnaik University Of TechnologyDharitri DasAjay Binay Institute Of Technology Piloo Mody College Of Architecture DirectorCouncil Of Architecture RegistrarThe State Of Odisha Industries Department SecretaryThe State Of Odisha Orissa Joint Entrance Examination 2010 (Ojee 2010) ChairmanThe State Of Odisha Policy Planning Body, Directorate Of Technical Education And Training Member SecretaryAdvocate Charu MathurAdvocate Aniruddha P. MayeeAdvocate Shibashish Misra