IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2321 OF 2009

LACHMI CHAND & ORS.

...APPELLANTS

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

$\ldots$ RESPONDENTS

$$

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Haryana states that he has been informed by Mr. Prem Malhotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants that he is not having any instructions in the matter from his client and no other counsel has been engaged.

In view of the aforesaid statement made and non-appearance of Mr. Prem Malhotra, learned counsel for the appellants supports the version made by learned counsel for the State of Haryana.

The civil appeal is dismissed.

$\cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots J.$ (ARUN MISHRA)

$\cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots J.$ (NAVIN SINHA)

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.5 SECTION XV (Regular Matter)

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2321 of 2009

LACHMI CHAND & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. Respondent(s)

Date : 12/05/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [VACATION BENCH]

For Appellant(s) Mr. Prem Malhotra, AOR (NP)

For Respondent(s) Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Adv. Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The civil appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(Meenakshi Kohli) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master (SH) Court Master (NS) [Signed order is placed on the file]