Subramanian Swamy vs. State Of T. N

\200 T.P.(C) No. 779-783 OF 1998 ITEM No.29 Court No.12 SECTION XVIA A/N MATTER S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Transfer Petition.(Civil) No.779-783/1998 SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF T.N. & ORS Respondent (s) ( With Appln(s). for interim Relief and impleading party ) With T.P.(C) No.1049-1055/1998 (With Appln. for stay) Date : 18/01/2002 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. PHUKAN For Petitioner Petitioner-In-Person in 779-783/98 in 1049-1055/98 Mr. R.N. Ramalingam,Adv. and for Respdt. in 779-783/98 For Respondent Dr. Rajeev Dhavan,Sr.Adv. Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu,Adv. Mr. John Mathew, Adv. Mr. Manish Garg, Adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Altaf Ahmed, ASG. Mr. S.Wasim A.Qadri, Adv. Mr. S.N. Terdol,Adv. Mrs.Revathy Raghavan,Adv. Mr. G. Umapathy, Mr. C. Paramsivan, Adv. for Intervenor Mr. P. Krishnamoorthy,Sr.Adv. Ms. Malini Poduval,Adv. Mr. Lan Singhlu Rongmei,Adv. Mr. Vipin Mathew Benjamin,Adv. for Impleader/ Mr. K. Sukumaran,Sr.Adv. Corpn. of Cochin Mr. N.R. Shonker,Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan,Adv. for Invervenor Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R L.......L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....J .SP2 It is submitted by Mr. Subramanian Swamy, petitioner-in-person that the copy of the letter dated ..2/- :2: 16.1.2002 seeking adjournment circulated by counsel

for the State of Tamil Nadu has not been furnished to him and it has caused inconvenience to him. We hope the default, on the part of the counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu, will not be repeated in future. In view of the letter circulated matters are adjourned by three weeks as prayed for by the counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu.

List the matters after three weeks before a Bench of which Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Santosh Hegde is not a member.

.SP1

(Pawan Kumar) (Prem Prakash) Court Master Court Master