eCourtsIndia

H. U. D. A vs. Kamal Goyal

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.K. Mathur
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:8 Jan 2007
CNR:SCIN010121002002

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

9 Sept 2002

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IA 2-4/2005 in CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5862 OF 2002

H.U.D.A. Appellant (s)

VERSUS

SOM NATH Respondent(s)

(With appln.for c/delay in filing compliance report dt. 24.9.2004 with affidavit, appln.for impleadment as a party respondent and for permission to file impleadment appln. as party respondent) with IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.5884/2002 IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.5861/2002

IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.5880/2002

IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.5869/2002

IA.No.1-3 in CA.No.7553/2002

IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.5872/2002

IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.5877/2002

IA.No.2-3 in CA.No.5882/2002

IA.No.2-4 in CA.No.6032/2002

(With appln.for c/delay in filing compliance report dt. 24.9.2004 with affidavit, appln.for impleadment as a party respondent and for permission to file impleadment appln. as party respondent)

Contempt Petition No. 151/2006 in CA.No.5882/2002

Date: 08/01/2007 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN For Appellant(s) Mr. J.P. Dhanda,Adv.

Mr.Prem Malhotra, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. B.S. Gupta, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The learned counsel submits that he will seek instructions from his client that whether he has received the amount as per the directions of this Court or not. He prays for two weeks' time, time prayed is allowed.

List the matter after two weeks.

[ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Vijay Aggarwal ] Court Master Court Master

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(42) - 2 Feb 2007

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 8 Jan 2007

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(40) - 6 Nov 2006

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 12 Sept 2006

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 28 Apr 2006

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 20 Mar 2006

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 20 Mar 2006

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 24 Feb 2006

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 3 Feb 2005

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(3) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(4) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(5) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(6) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(8) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(9) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(10) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(11) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(12) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(13) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(14) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(15) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(16) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(17) - 24 Sept 2004

Judgment

Click to view

Order(18) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(24) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 24 Sept 2004

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 7 Sept 2002

ROP

Click to view