Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd vs. National Highways Authority Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 Apr 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.47
COURT NO.8
SECTION XVI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11505/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2014 in CAN No. 2130/2014,20/03/2014 in FMA No. 254/2012 passed by the High Court at Calcutta)
BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
Respondent(s)
(With application for directions and interim relief and office report) WITH $SLP(C)$ No. 13590/2014 [BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V. M/S. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA1 (With application for directions, permission to file volume-II, to bring on record subsequent facts and documents, exemption from <pre>filing certified copy of the impugned judgment and Office Report)</pre> Date: 12/12/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Kshatrashal Raj, Adv.<br>Mr. Vishal Prasad, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek V. Deshmukh, Adv.<br>For M/s. Parekh & Co., Advs. | |
---|---|---|
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Jos Chiramel, Adv.<br>Ms. Iti Johri, Adv.<br>Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, A.O.R. | |
ignature Not Verified<br>$\overline{\phantom{a}}$ |
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the sole respondent and having perused the earlier order of the Division Bench dated 13th August, 2012 and present impugned order dated 20th March, 2014, we are of the view that the grievance of the petitioner can be adequately redressed by requesting the High Court to dispose of the appeal itself once and for all.
In fact, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent submitted that as directed by the High Court in its order dated 13th August, 2012, the respondent has complied with the requirement of filing requisite number of paper books which were used before the courts below. Though Mr. Parekh, learned senior counsel stated that such compliance was not within the time stipulated, inasmuch as, it is now stated that all papers have been filed there should be no impediment for the Division Bench to hear the appeal and dispose of finally. In fact it is also stated by the learned counsel for the respondent that the appeal is listed before the High Court in the final list for 1st December, 2014. Taking note of all the above facts, we request the
High Court to dispose of the appeal itself finally before 31st January, 2015.
With the above observations, the Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of.
[KALYANI GUPTA] COURT MASTER
[SHARDA KAPOOR] COURT MASTER