Prof. M Ramalinga Raju vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

ITEM NO.23

COURT NO.4

SECTION XII-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 6941/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-05-2021 in WPPIL No. 116/2019 passed by the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amravati)

PROF. M RAMALINGA RAJU

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 63107/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT & IA No. 63106/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date: 04-05-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.

• HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
• For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ramesh Allanki, Adv. Mr. Siddanth Buxy, Adv. Ms. Aruna Gupta, AOR Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi, Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR Mr. Girish Chowdhary, Adv. Mr. Gowtham Polanki, Adv. Ms. Deepshikha Sansanwal, Adv.
  • Mr. Apoorv Kurup, AOR
  • Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, AOR Mr. Sunny Kumar, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Section Verified Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has stated at the Beside Ball T That during the pendency of the present proceedings, the petitioner has completed his tenure and therefore, the present Special Leave Petition has become infructuous.

Respondent $(s)$

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, however, has requested to make suitable observation that so long as the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is concerned, the same stands.

In view of the above, the present SLP is dismissed/disposed of as having become infructuous as stated on behalf of the petitioner. Meaning thereby, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court stands.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

(R. NATARAJAN) (NAND KISHOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)