Jaipur Development Authority Secretary General vs. Jamea Hidayat Trust And Ors. Chairman

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble S.V.N. Bhatti
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:21 Jul 2011
CNR:SCIN010117782010

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR P.R.BORA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1572/2011

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With prayer for interim relief and office report )

WITH SLP(C) NO. 14408 of2010
(With prayer for interimrelief)
SLP(C) NO. 14455 of 2010
(With prayer for interimrelief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 14459 of 2010
(With prayer for interimrelief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 14502 of 2010
(With prayer for interimrelief and office report)
SLP(C) NO. 14503 of 2010
(With prayer for interimrelief and office report)

Date: 21/07/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

  • For Petitioner(s) Mr.Vikram Gulati,adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv. Mr.Niraj Bobby Paonam,adv. Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya
  • For Respondent(s) Mr.Bhanoo Sood,adv. M/S. "Coac",Adv. Mr.Asgar Ali,adv. Ms. Pratibha Jain ,Adv Mr.V.A.Mohta,adv. Mr. R.D. Upadhyay ,Adv Mr. S.K. Bhattacharya ,Adv Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan ,Adv

ITEM NO.80 -2-

contd....2

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

In SLP(C) No.1572/11 service is incomplete in respect of respondent Nos. 6 and 7. Await. In SLP(C) No.14408/10 & SLP(C) No.14502/10 respondent No.11 is yet to be served. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps to serve respondent No.11 within four weeks by registered post acknowledgment due. If steps are taken, issue notice. If steps are not taken, place the matter before the Hon'ble

Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders. In SLP(C) No.14459/10 AD card duly signed by respondent Nos.3-5, 7, 10, 12 & 13 has been received. But none has entered appearance. Four weeks time is granted to serve respondents and file counter affidavit. In SLP(C) No.14503/10 Petitioner to take steps against respondent No.10. AD card duly signed have been received from respondent Nos. 3, 4, 6,9 11 and 12. None has entered appearance. The other respondents have not filed counter affidavit. Four weeks time is granted. List the matter on 25.08.2011.

(P.R.BORA) Registrar

SB

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(72) - 30 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(71) - 18 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(70) - 6 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(69) - 12 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 30 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 8 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(66) - 11 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 22 Sept 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(64) - 18 Sept 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 9 Aug 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 27 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(61) - 27 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(62) - 27 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(57) - 23 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 23 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(59) - 23 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(56) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(51) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(52) - 5 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(53) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 26 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(49) - 26 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(50) - 26 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(45) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(46) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(47) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 27 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 27 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(44) - 27 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(39) - 26 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(40) - 26 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(41) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(36) - 7 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 7 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 26 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 26 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(32) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 14 Jul 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 13 Feb 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 22 Nov 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 3 Oct 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 6 Aug 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 15 Jul 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 16 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(24) - 26 Feb 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 11 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 19 Nov 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 24 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 Aug 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 3 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 2 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 11 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 8 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 12 Apr 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 2 Mar 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 14 Dec 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 7 Dec 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 26 Sept 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 25 Aug 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 21 Jul 2011

ROP

Viewing

Order(8) - 10 May 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Apr 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 14 Jan 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 16 Dec 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Nov 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 4 Oct 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Aug 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 26 Jul 2010

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search