eCourtsIndiaBeta

Yusuf Baig vs. State Of Rajasthan

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judges:Hon'ble M.Y. Eqbal, Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Type:Criminal Appeal
Reg no:1695/2010
Filing no:11758/2010
CNR:SCIN010117582010

Parties & Advocates

Petitioner

1
Yusuf Baig

Petitioner Advocate

1
Varinder Kumar Sharma

Respondent

1
State Of Rajasthan

Respondent Advocate

1
Milind Kumar

Case History with Orders

Disposed

Final Status

7 Jan 2016

Order(9) - 7 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Order(8) - 7 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

17 Jun 2015

Order(7) - 17 Jun 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Order(6) - 17 Jun 2015

ROP - of Main Case

1 Mar 2013

Order(5) - 1 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

6 Sept 2010

Order(4) - 6 Sept 2010

ROP - of Main Case

Case Registered

Registration No: 1695/2010

6 Jul 2010

Order(3) - 6 Jul 2010

ROP - of Main Case

14 May 2010

Order(2) - 14 May 2010

ROP - of Main Case

3 May 2010

Order(1) - 3 May 2010

ROP - of Main Case

13 Apr 2010

Case Filed

13 Apr 2010 Filing No: 11758/2010

Interlocutory Applications (IA) (1)

14113/2010
Particular: GRANT OF BAIL

Tagged Matters (2)

11758/2010(06-09-2010 12:00 AM)Crl.A. No. 001695 / 2010 Registered on 06-09-2010SLP(Crl) No. 005448 / 2010 Registered on 06-07-2010 - CRL_A

Petitioner: YUSUF BAIG
Respondent: STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Type: M•Status: P•Entry: 24-11-2014

11344/2009(06-09-2010 12:00 AM)Crl.A. No. 001694 / 2010 Registered on 06-09-2010SLP(Crl) No. 004244 / 2010 Registered on 06-09-2010 - CRL_A

Petitioner: BABLU & BABALIA
Respondent: STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Type: C•Status: P•Entry: 24-11-2014

Earlier Court Details (4)

Court:
High Court
State:
RAJASTHAN
Case No:
DBCRL-801-2002
Order Date:
2009-02-09
Judgment Challenged:
Yes
Judgment Type:
Final
Court:
High Court
State:
RAJASTHAN
Case No:
DBCRL-886-2002
Order Date:
2009-02-09
Judgment Challenged:
No
Judgment Type:
-
Court:
High Court
State:
RAJASTHAN
Case No:
DBCRL-801-2002
Order Date:
2009-02-09
Judgment Challenged:
Yes
Judgment Type:
Final
Court:
High Court
State:
RAJASTHAN
Case No:
DBCRL-886-2002
Order Date:
2009-02-09
Judgment Challenged:
No
Judgment Type:
-

Share This Case

Similar Case Search
Case Content Last Updated22 Aug 2025, 9:54 am IST