Madhav Kant Mishra vs. Union Of India Department Of Social Welfare Ministry Of Hrd Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
30 Jun 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | |
---|---|
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL | |
Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 576/2014 | |
MADHAV KANT MISHRA | Petitioner(s) |
VERSUS | |
$U.O.I.$ & ORS. | Respondent(s) |
Date: 09/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. | |
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Sidharth Vikram, Adv.<br>Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv.<br>Ms. Payal Dayal, Adv.<br>Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. |
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv.<br>Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Adv.<br>Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv.<br>Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. |
- Ms. Varsha Poddar, Adv.
- Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.
- Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv.
- Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sharma, Adv.
- Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Adv.
- Ms. Garima Tiwari, Adv.
- Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, Adv.
- Mr. Somnath Banerjee, Adv.
- Mr. Parijat Sinha, Adv.
- Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv.
- Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv.
- Mr. V. G. Pragasam, Adv.
- Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, Adv.
- Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv.
- Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv.
- $M/s$ Arputham, Adv.
- Aruna & Co., Adv.
- M/s Corporate Law Group, Adv.
- Mr. K V Jagdishvaran, Adv.
- Ms. G. Indira, Adv.
- Mr. Edward Belho, Adv.
$t(s)$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
REGISTRAR COURT. 1
ITEM NO.28
Mr. Amit Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. K. Luikang Michael, Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema,Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. Mr. Suryanarayan Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. Ms. Anindita Pujari, Adv. Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv. Mr. C.K. Sasi, Adv. Mr. Manu Krishnan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
None appears for respondent Nos.16, 18, 24 and 25, despite due service.
Respondent Nos.4, 9, 12, 20, 21, 27, 29, 30, 32, 33 and 36 have already filed the counter affidavit.
Respondent Nos.14 and 15 have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity having been granted. Further opportunity is declined.
The matter stands complete.
Registry to process the same for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar