Lingamurthy G vs. The State Of Karnataka

ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION IV-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 12006/2021 LINGAMURTHY G. & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

Date: 28-01-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

$M/S$ . Devasa & Co., AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Ashish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Jain, Adv. Mr. Vishal Banshal, Adv. Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR Ms. Supreeta Sharanagouda, AOR Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the <pre>Court made the following</pre>

O R D E R

Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

Service of notice of alternative arrangement on respondent No.3 is complete but none has entered appearance.

Signature Not Verified Despite<br>Digitally signed by last opportunity having been aranted. <table><tbody>Image: Second contentNo.4has not filedcounteraffidavit.Reason: Second contentNo.4has not filedcounteraffidavit. Ld. <pre>counsel for respondent No.4 seeks two weeks' more time to</pre>

file counter affidavit. Time is granted, as last and final opportunity.

Ld. counsel for respondent No.26 seeks two weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Granted.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No.5 is found to be defective. Two weeks' time is granted for curing the defects in the vakalatnama and for filing counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars in respect of respondent Nos.39 and 42 within two weeks.

Remaining respondents have been served but none has entered appearance.

List on 10.3.2022.

SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Registrar