Lingamurthy G vs. The State Of Karnataka

ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION IV-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12006/2021 LINGAMURTHY G. & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

Date: 08-10-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

M/S. Devasa & Co., AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. Ashish Yadav, Adv. Mr. Rakshit Jain, Adv. Mr. Vishal Banshal, Adv.

Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the <pre>Court made the following</pre>

ORDER

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 for filing counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars in respect of respondent Nos.7, 12, 19, 21, 27, 33, 39 to 42 and 44 within two weeks.

Ld. Advocate, Mr. Sharanagouda Patil appearing on behalf of respondent No.5 submits that he has filed vakalatnama yesterday. Registry to verify. He seeks four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Granted.

Signature Not Verified Remaining respondents have been served but none has $\begin{array}{c}\n\text{undered} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{undered} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{undered} \ \text{undered} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle} \ \text{triangle$

List again on 3.12.2021.

RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar

Respondent(s)