Sheena Agro Farms (P) Ltd vs. Zafar Javeed

ò1 ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).7777/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/12/2016 in CMA No. 364/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh) M/S. SHEENA AGRO FARMS (P) LTD. AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DR. MIR AKBAR ALI KHAN Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for bringing on record additional documents and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11794/2017 (With appln for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11807/2017 (With appln for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11829/2017 (With appln for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 24/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.V.S. Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Anand Padmanabhan, Adv. Mr. Chandrasen Reddy, Adv. Ms. Amritha Sarayoo, Adv. Mr. Romil Pathan, Adv. Ms. Ananya Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Huzefa A. Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nakul Dewan, Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. N. Naveen Kumar, Adv. 2 Mr. C. George Thomas, Adv. Ms. Akriti Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Tanya Shree, Adv. Ms. Qurratulain, Adv. Mr. Zain Maqbool, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that since there are various disputed facts and mixed questions of law and facts which are involved in the case, it would be appropriate to direct the decision of the suit itself on time bound basis, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties. Let Trial Court make an endeavour to decide the suit as far as possible within a period of one year from today. As agreed to, let status quo with respect to the property in question be maintained by the parties and also with regard to alienation or creation of charge, in addition, there to. The observations made by the Trial Court and the High Court shall not come in the way of the Trial Court to decide the matter finally. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of,

accordingly. (B.Parvathi) Court Master (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master