Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd vs. The Collector, Aurangabad

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:2 Feb 2016
CNR:SCIN010116142015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

18 Apr 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

¢# ITEM NO.59 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11441/2015 MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 11450/2015 (With Interim Relief) SLP(C) No. 11953/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12052/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 12055/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11662/2015 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 02/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh,Adv. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2016.02.02 For Respondent(s) 17:25:17 IST Reason: Mr. Subodh S. Patil,Adv. -2- Item No.59 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent Nos.1 to 4 within three weeks time. Ld. Counsel has requested for additional notice to be served through the concerned District Court. Allowed. Notices be accordingly issued.

None appears for respondent nos.6,9 and 12 despite due service.

Last opportunity of four weeks is granted to the ld. Counsel for respondent nos. 5,7,8,10,11 and 13 for filing counter affidavit.

SLP(C) NO.11450/2015

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent Nos.2,5,7,11,20,24-28, 30,31, 34,41,45,46,49,50,52,59,60,61,63 to 68,73,75,76,79 to 81,83, 84, 86,87,89 to 93,97,98,100,101,103,105,107,108,112 to 123, 126 to 129,132 to 134,136,138 to 142,146,149 to 158,160 to 162,164,165,167,168,173,176,181 to 191,194 to 200,203, 212 , 213, 219, 221, 224 to 236 and 241 to 247 within three weeks time as last opportunity. Ld. Counsel has requested for additional notice to be served through the concerned District Court. Allowed. Notices be accordingly issued. -3-

Item No.59

None appears for respondent nos.1,3,4,6, 8 to 10, 12 to 19, 21 to 23, 29,32,33,35 to 40, 42 to 44, 47,48,51,53 to 58, 62,69 to 72, 74,77, 78, 82,85,88, 94 to 96, 99, 102, 104,106, 109 to 111, 124, 125, 130,131, 135, 137, 143 to 145, 147,148,159,163,166,169 to 172, 174,175, 177 to 180, 192,193, 201, 202, 204 to 211, 214 to 218, 220, 222, 223, 237 to 240 and 248 to 252 despite due service. SLP(C) NO.11662/2015

None appears for the respondents despite due service. SLP(C) NO.11953/2015

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent Nos. 1,2 and 7 within three

weeks time. Ld. Counsel has requested for additional notice to be served through the concerned District Court. Allowed. Notices be accordingly issued.

None appears for respondent nos. 3 to 6 despite due service.

SLP(C) NO.12052/2015

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent Nos. 3 to 6, 10,16,23,37,51,54 and 55 within three weeks time. Ld. Counsel has requested for additional notice to be served through the concerned District Court. Allowed. Notices be accordingly issued.

None appears for the remaining respondents despite due service.

-4-

Item No.59

SLP(C) NO.12055/2015

None appears for respondent nos. 1 to 5 despite due service.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent Nos. 6 to 8 within three weeks time. Ld. Counsel has requested for additional notice to be served through the concerned District Court. Allowed. Notices be accordingly issued.

List again on 18.4.2016.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(30) - 6 Nov 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 20 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 1 Mar 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 11 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 7 Jan 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 6 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 8 Mar 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 14 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 14 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 25 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 25 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 20 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 15 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 15 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 18 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 18 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 2 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 2 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(10) - 6 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 6 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 25 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 25 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 13 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 13 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 24 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 24 Apr 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(5) - 24 Apr 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 15 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 15 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data