Abu Bakkar Siddik vs. The State Of West Bengal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose, Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [2]
Listed On:
25 Jul 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
60440/2023, 61485/2023, 61485/2023, 62560/2023, 62560/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.51
COURT NO.6
SECTION XVI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)...................................
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-07-2023 in CAN No. 10/2023 passed by the High Court At Calcutta)
KAMALESH KAPAT & ANR.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
([TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 44 I.E. T.P.(C) No. 1260-1269/2023]........ FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.135892/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.135890/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) )
WITH
Diary No(s). 28468/2023 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137562/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.137561/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))
Date: 25-07-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR Mr. Shashank Khurana, Adv. Mr. Vishal Bansal, Adv. Ms. Shrika Gautam, Adv. Mr. Anindya Lahiri, Adv. Mr. Partha Sil, AOR Mr. Tavish Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Pranati Das, Adv.
Mr. Pushpal Chakraborty, Adv.
Mr. Argha Chowdhury, Adv.
Mr. Samrat De Paul, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Leave is given to file the present petitions to the petitioners.
So far as the impugned order is concerned, let the names of 907 candidates and their roll numbers be published as directed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court.
As regards direction No. (ii) and (iii) contained in the impugned order are concerned, let this part of the order remain stayed for a week.
List after one week.
The OMR sheets shall be produced before this Court on the next date of hearing in the sealed cover.
Though, the judgment impugned is against an order of a Single Judge of the High Court at Calcutta, considering the fact that on the same point other matters are pending before this Court, we are entertaining these petitions.