Panchtatva Enterprises vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman, K.M. Joseph, Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Jul 2021
CNR:SCIN010115462021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Mention Memo

Before:

Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman, Hon'ble K.M. Joseph, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

7 Jan 2021

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.28 + 40 Court 2 (Video Conferencing)

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

<pre>Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 202/2021</pre>

M/S PANCHTATVA ENTERPRISES

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.61072/2021-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.61078/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 6927/2021 (XI) [ITEM NO. 28.1] (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.61374/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.61375/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT)

with W.P. (Crl.) No. 200 of 2021 [ITEM NO. 40] (for admission and IR and stay application and application for <pre>exemption from filing original vakalatnama/other document)</pre> Date: 01-07-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harshit Sethi, Adv. Mr. Keshavam Chaudhri, Adv. Ms. Anzu. K. Varkev, AOR Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Adv. Ms. Ria Khanna, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the 🏂tioner(s).

We find no ground to entertain these matters. The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed with costs of Rs. 50,000/-

SECTION X

(Rupees Fifty Thousand) in each case, to be paid to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks from today.

The Special Leave Petition also stands dismissed.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (NISHA TRIPATHI) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER