Telangana Power Generation Corporation Ltd (Tsgenco) vs. Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Ltd

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:18 Oct 2022
CNR:SCIN010115402022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed [as not pressed]

Listed On:

18 Oct 2022

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

56744/2022,56748/2022,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.8 COURT NO.5 SECTION XII-A SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 11540/2022 in C.A. No. 11435/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-11-2018 in C.A. No. 11435/2018 passed by the Supreme Court Of India)

TELANGANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD (TSGENCO)Appellant(s)

VERSUS

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD & ORS.Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.56748/2022-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No.56744/2022-APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION

Date: 18-10-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.

  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
  • Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Abhinav Rao, AOR Mr. Rahul Jajoo,, Adv.
    • Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Mr. Korada Pramod Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dhuli Gopi Krishna, Adv.
    • Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Adv. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv.
  • For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rohtash Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

In view of the subsequent judgment dated 11.10.2022 passed in b itempt Petition (C) D. No. 28852 of 2020, learned counsel the applicant(s) does not press the ็ล<sub></sub>bpearing for present application, however, without prejudice to the rights and

contentions of the respective employees on non-compliance of the orders and the submission on behalf of the applicant that full salaries have not been paid.

The application stands dismissed as not pressed accordingly.

(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI)

ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR