Indian Muslim For Progress And Reforms Impar vs. Union Of India

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:21 Apr 2023
CNR:SCIN010115152023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

21 Apr 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 428/2023

INDIAN MUSLIM FOR PROGRESS AND REFORMS IMPAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 21-04-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Javed R Shaikh, Adv. Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, AOR Mr. Amir Kaleem, Adv. Mr. Paras Nath Singh, Adv. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Mohd Wasiq Khan, Adv. Mr. Shaikh Saipan Dastgir, Adv. Mr. Mithlesh Kumar, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

This writ petition is stated to be filed in public interest seeking inter alia the implementation of the directions issued by this Court in the case of Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India and Others (2018) 9 SCC 501.

We have heard Shri Javed R. Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

During the course of his submission, he drew our attention to the pertinent passage in the aforesaid judgment wherein it was directed that the States shall frame a scheme for the purpose of providing victim compensation in cases of Digitally signed by Nidhi Ahuja Date: 2023.04.21 17:51:20 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

lynching/mob violence under Section 357A of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973. He submitted that certain States have formulated a scheme while many of the States have not done so till date. It was further submitted that the said judgment had given guidelines as to the manner in which the victim compensation scheme had to be formulated inasmuch as the State Governments have to give due regard to the nature of the bodily injury, psychological injury and loss of earnings including other opportunities such as loss of educational opportunities and expenses incurred on account of the suffering due to the mob lynching/ mob violence.

In this regard it was submitted that the endeavour of the petitioner is to seek implementation of the directions issued by this Court in the aforesaid judgment and further to have as far as possible a uniform policy for grant of exgratia compensation to the victims of hate crime/ mob lynching.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, we issue notice to the respondents.

The respondents are directed to file their respective affidavits with regard to the implementation of the directions issued in the aforesaid case and the manner in which it has been done.

The said affidavit shall be filed within a period of eight weeks from the date of the service of notice.

(NIDHI AHUJA) (RENU KAPOOR) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

2

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 29 Nov 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 8 Nov 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 26 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 13 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 21 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data

Indian Muslim For Progress And Reforms ImparUnion Of IndiaThe State Of Andhra PradeshThe State Of Arunachal PradeshThe State Of AssamThe State Of BiharThe State Of ChhattisgarhThe State Of GoaThe State Of GujaratThe State Of HaryanaThe State Of Himachal PradeshThe State Of JharkhandThe State Of KarnatakaThe State Of KeralaThe State Of Madhya PradeshThe State Of MaharashtraThe State Of ManipurThe State Of MeghalayaThe State Of MizoramThe State Of NagalandThe State Of OdishaThe State Of PunjabThe State Of RajasthanThe State Of SikkimThe State Of Tamil NaduThe State Of TelanganaThe State Of TripuraThe State Of UttarakhandThe State Of Uttar PradeshThe State Of West BengalThe Union Territory Of Andaman And Nicobar IslandsThe Union Territory Of ChandigarhThe Union Territory Of Dadra And Nagar Haveli And Daman And DiuThe State Of Nct Of DelhiThe Union Territory Of Jammu And KashmirThe Union Territory Of LadakhThe Union Territory Of LakshadweepThe Union Territory Of PuducherryAdvocate Rizwan AhmadAdvocate Shreekant Neelappa TerdalAdvocate Aaditya Aniruddha PandeAdvocate Siddhesh Shirish KotwalAdvocate Sunny ChoudharyAdvocate Shuvodeep RoyAdvocate Baani KhannaAdvocate Akshat KumarAdvocate Pukhrambam Ramesh KumarAdvocate Sameer AbhyankarAdvocate Kunal MimaniAdvocate V. N. RaghupathyAdvocate Abhimanyu TewariAdvocate Anand ShankarAdvocate Swati GhildiyalAdvocate Surbhi KapoorAdvocate Tulika MukherjeeAdvocate Prem PrakashAdvocate Ityunjai SinghAdvocate Ruchira GoelAdvocate Avijit Mani TripathiAdvocate Mukesh Kumar Maroria