S. Vijayan & Etc. Etc. vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu & Etc. , Etc.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
17 Apr 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29245/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/09/2014 in WA No. 1031/2014 passed by the High Court Of Madras)
V. LAVANYA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. Respondent(s) (With application for impleadment and permission to place additional documents on record and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 29353-29354/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29634/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 29715/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32238-32239/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32240/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32241/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34568/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 33127-33130/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 6543/2015 (With Office Report) S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7238-7240/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Meenakshi Kohli Date: 2015.07.22 S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 7197/2015 05:16:54 IST Reason: (With appln.(s) for permission to file SLP and Office Report) 1 SLP(C) No. 34978/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32160/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
SLP(C) No. 31629-31642/2014
(With Office Report)
Date : 21/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Krishna Murthy, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Shankaran, Adv. Mr. T. Harish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anandh Kannan N.,Adv. Mr. Ajmal Khan, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan, Adv. Ms. Vandana, Adv. Mr. Anish Mohd., Adv. Mr. L. K. Pandey,Adv. Mr. Satya Mitra Garg,Adv. Mr. S. Louis, Adv. Ms. Manju Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. N. Rajaraman,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Ramamoorthy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, AAG Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Sriram J. Thalapaty, Adv. Ms. Vanita Chandrakant Giri, Adv. Mr. Jayant Patel, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar,Adv. Mr. P.B. Suresh Babu, Adv. Mr. V. Ramasubramanian,Adv. Ms. Monika Arora, Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Upadhyay, Adv.
2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
There appears to be a conflict between the decisions rendered by the Principal Bench and Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court.
With regard to the decision rendered by the Madurai Bench, it is stated by learned counsel appearing for the State that a review petition was filed but that was withdrawn with liberty to file a special leave petition against the decision of the Madurai Bench.
Learned counsel for the State says that the special leave petition is likely to be filed within a week.
Under the circumstances, we do not feel the necessity of going ahead with this case at the present moment but would like to wait for the special leave petition to be filed against the decision of the Madurai Bench so that if there is difference of opinion between the decisions rendered by the Principal Bench and the Madurai Bench that can be resolved.
Under the circumstances, the matters are adjourned for two weeks.
(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
3