Azure Power (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Civil Appeal No(s). 1747/2015

GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED

$Appellant(s)$

VERSUS

AZURE POWER (GUJARAT) PVT. LIMITED & ORS Respondent(s)

WITH C.A. No. $1850/2015$ Office Report)

C.A. No. 4861/2015 Office Report)

C.A. No. 3787/2015 Office Report)

C.A. No. 4858/2015 Office Report)

Date : $06/10/2016$ This appeal was called on for hearing today.

<pre>For Appellant(s)</pre>

Ms Yogamaya M.G., Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Jesal Wahi, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr Manpreet Lamba, Adv. Ms Samapika Biswal, Adv. M/s. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

C.A. No.1747/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 3 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. However, the ld. counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that he will be filing counter affidavit during the course of the day. If filed, be taken on record, otherwise further opportunity stands declined.

Respondent no.2 does not want to file counter affidavit. None appears for respondent no.4 despite due service.

Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.

C.A. No.1850,3787 of 2015

The ld. counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that he will be filing counter affidavit during the course of the day. If filed, be taken on record, otherwise further opportunity stands declined.

None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.

Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.

C.A. No.4858/2015

None appears for both respondents despite due service.

Matter stands complete. However, to be listed before the Hon'ble Court alongwith connected matters.

Item No.20

C.A. No.4861/2015

Respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined.

None appears for respondent no.2 despite due service.

Opportunity to respondent no.4 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Respondent no.3 is common as respondent no.2 in C.A.No.1747/2015 and is duly represented therein, as such, service is deemed complete in this matter also.

Matter stands complete.

Registry to process all the matters for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar