The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. Through Chief Secretary Government Of Rajasthan vs. The Jamea Hidayat Trust And Ors Through Its Chairman Fazlur Rahim Son Of Late Mohammed Abdur Rahira Aged About 47 Years Musalman By Caste

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:27 Oct 2015
CNR:SCIN010113432012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

SECTIONXV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 1572/2011 WITH SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 14408, 14455, 14459, 14502, 14503 of 2010 and 16534, 17349, 19574, 19581, 19583, 19584 OF 2012 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ETC. ETC. PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

M/S. S.M.S. INVESTMENT CORP. & ORS. ETC. ETC. RESPONDENT(S)

OFFICE REPORT

The matters abovementioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.01.2011 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:

"Delay condoned.

Issue notice.

Mr. Sarvesh Singh, Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, and Ms. Pratibha Jain, advocates accept notice on behalf of M/s. Ridhi Sidhi Builttech P. Ltd, Jamea Hidayat Trust and S.M.S. Investment Corporation respectively. Mr. K. L. Janjani, advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in SLP (C) No. 14503 of 2010. They pray for and are granted four weeks' time to file counteraffidavits. Four weeks' time thereafter is granted to the petitioners to file rejoinderaffidavits, if any. Notice be sent to the remaining respondents. Statusquo, as it exists today, shall be maintained

by the parties until further orders."

The Service position of each matter is detailed as under:

SLP(C) No.RespondentsServices
TotalServedRemarksStatus
1572/20111313Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. has entered appeaerance on b/o R.<br>Nos. 1 to 3. M/s. S. K. Bhattacharya, R. D. Upadhyay and<br>K. L. Janjani, Advs. have filed V/A on b/o R. Nos. 4, 10,<br>11 to 13 respectively but C/A not filed on b/o them. R.<br>Nos. 5-9 are served through AD but no one has entered<br>appearance so far. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed<br>R/A so far.Complete
14408/201013R. Nos. 1, 3 and 8 & 9 are represented through M/s.<br>COAC, Ms. Pratibha Jain and S. N. Terdal, Advs and filed<br>counter affidavit respectively. R. Nos. 2, 4 to 6, 7 and 13<br>represented through M/s. Equity Lex Associates, K. L.<br>Janjani, R. Gopalakrishnan and Ruchi Kohli, Advocates,<br>but counter affidavit is awaited. R. No. 10 & 12 are<br>served through A/D cards but no one has entered<br>appearance so far.<br>SLP against R. No. 11<br>has been<br>rejected vide Court's order dated 14.07.2014 . Counsel for<br>the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete
14455/201013R. No. 1, 8 & 9 represented through Ms. Pratibha Jain<br>and S. N. Terdal, Advocates and filed counter affidavit.<br>R. Nos. 2, 3 to 5, 6, 7 and 13 are represented through M/s.<br>Equity Lex Associates, K. L. Janjani, M/s. COAC, Pragati<br>Neekhra and Ruchi Kohli, Advs. Respectively, but<br>counter affidavit is awaited. R. No. 10 & 12 are served<br>through AD cards but no one has entered appearance so<br>far. SLP against R. No. 11 has been rejected vide Court's<br>order dated 14.07.2014. Counsel for the petitioner has not<br>filed R/A so far.Complete
14459/201013R. Nos. 1 to<br>10, 12 and<br>13R. No. 1, 8 & 9 represented through Ms. Pratibha Jain<br>and S. N. Terdal, Advocates and filed counter affidavit.<br>R. Nos. 2, 3 to 5, 6, 7 and 13 are represented through M/s.<br>Equity Lex Associates, K. L. Janjani, M/s. COAC, R.<br>Gopalakrishnan and Ruchi Kohli, Advs. Respectively, but<br>counter affidavit is awaited. R. No. 10 & 12 are served<br>through AD cards but no one has entered appearance so<br>far. SLP against R. No. 11 has been rejected vide Court's<br>order dated 14.07.2014. Counsel for the petitioner has not<br>filed R/A so far.Complete
14502/201013R. Nos. 1 to<br>10, 12 and<br>13R. Nos. 1, 3 and 8 & 9 are represented through M/s.<br>COAC, Ms. Pratibha Jain and S. N. Terdal, Advs and filed<br>counter affidavit respectively.<br>R. Nos. 2, 4 to 6 and 7 represented through M/s Equity<br>Lex Associates, K.L. Janjani, Pragati Neekhra and Ruchi<br>Kohli, Advocates, but counter affidavit is awaited.<br>R. No. 10, 12 & 13 are served through A/D cards but no<br>one has entered appearance so far. SLP against R. No. 11<br>has been rejected vide Court's order dated 14.07.2014.<br>Counsel for the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete
14503/20101010R. Nos. 7 & 8 are represented through Mr. S. N. Terdal<br>and filed counter-affidavit. R. Nos. 1, 2, 3 to 5 and 6 are<br>represented through M/s. Equity Lex Associates, Ms.<br>Pratibha Jain, K. L. Janjani & Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Advs. but<br>counter-affidavit is awaited in r/o R. No. 1, 3 to 5 & 6. R.<br>Nos. 9 & 10 are served through AD cards but no one has<br>entered appearance so far. Counsel for the petitioner has<br>not filed R/A so far.
16534/20121010R. No. 4 & 5 represented through Mr. B. K. Prasad, Adv.<br>and filed counter affidavit. SLP against R. Nos.1-3 & 6-10<br>has been rejected vide Court's order dated 14.07.2014.<br>Counsel for the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete
17349/201211R.NOS. 7,8<br>& 10 served<br>in connected<br>matters.M\s. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, B.K. Prasad and Ms. Partibha<br>Jain, Advocates have entered appearance in r/o R. Nos. 1,<br>3 & 4<br>and R. No.11 and have filed counter affidavit.<br>Copy of the same already included in the paper books.<br>SLP against R. Nos. 2, 5-10 has been rejected vide Court's<br>order dated 14.07.2014. Counsel for the petitioner has not<br>filed R/A so far.Complete
19574/20121111Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv Mr. K.L. Janjani and Ms. Partibha<br>Jain, Advocates entered his appearance in r/o R. Nos. 4,<br>8-10 and R.No.1 Counter filed. In r/o R. Nos. 4 and 1<br>counter affidavit is awaited in respect of R. Nos. 8-10.<br>SLP against<br>R. Nos. 2, 5 & 6 has been rejected vide<br>Court's order dated 14.07.2014 A.D. Cards received from<br>R. Nos. 3,7,,11 but no one has entered appearance so far.<br>Counsel for the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete
19581/20121010Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv and Mr. K.L. Janjani Adv. entered<br>his appearance in r/o R. Nos. 5 and R.No. 8-10<br>respectively (C/Aff filed both the Advocates). SLP<br>against R. Nos. 3 and 7 has been rejected vide Court's<br>order dated 14.07.2014 (Judge- in- Chambers) A.D. Cards<br>received from R. Nos. 1,2,4 & 6 but no one has entered<br>appearance so far.<br>Counsel for the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete
19583/20121111M\s. B.K. Parsad and Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Advocates<br>entered his appearance in r/o R. Nos. 4 & 1 (counter<br>affidavit filed) respectively.<br>SLP against R. Nos. 2, 5, 6 &<br>8 has been rejected vide Court's order dated 14.07.2014<br>(Judge- in- Chambers) A.D. Cards received from R. Nos.<br>3,7,9-10 & 11 but no one has entered appearance so far.<br>Counsel for the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete
19584/201211Mr B.K. Parsad & Ms. Pratibha Jain, Advocates have<br>entered appearance on b/o R. Nos. 3 & 1 and counter<br>affidavit filed on behalf of them respectively. SLP against<br>R. Nos. 2, 6, 8 & 11 has been rejected vide Court's order<br>dated 14.07.2014 (Judge- in- Chambers)<br>A.D. Cards<br>received from R. Nos. 3-5, 7,9-10 but no one has entered<br>appearance so far.<br>Counsel for the petitioner has not filed R/A so far.Complete

The matters abovementioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.

Dated this the 6th day of May, 2015.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to: Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv. Mr. B.K. Parsad, Adv. Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Adv. Mr. K.L. Janjani, Adv Ms. Partibha Jain, Adv Mr. S. N. Terdal, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya, Adv. M/s. COAC, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. M/s Equity Lex Associates, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, Adv.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

2/db/F.OR.

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(72) - 30 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(71) - 18 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(70) - 6 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(69) - 12 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 30 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 8 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(66) - 11 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 22 Sept 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(64) - 18 Sept 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 9 Aug 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 27 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(61) - 27 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(62) - 27 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(57) - 23 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 23 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(59) - 23 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(56) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(51) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(52) - 5 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(53) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 26 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(49) - 26 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(50) - 26 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(45) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(46) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(47) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 27 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 27 Oct 2015

Office Report

Viewing

Order(44) - 27 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(39) - 26 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(40) - 26 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(41) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(36) - 7 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 7 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 26 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 26 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(32) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 14 Jul 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 13 Feb 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 22 Nov 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 3 Oct 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 6 Aug 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 15 Jul 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 16 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(24) - 26 Feb 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 11 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 19 Nov 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 24 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 Aug 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 3 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 2 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 11 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 8 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 12 Apr 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 2 Mar 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 14 Dec 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 7 Dec 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 26 Sept 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 25 Aug 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 21 Jul 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 10 May 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Apr 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 14 Jan 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 16 Dec 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Nov 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 4 Oct 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Aug 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 26 Jul 2010

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data