Bharat Singh Rajput vs. Gardenia Aims Developers Private Limited

ITEM NO.85 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH

Civil Appeal No(s). 883/2024

SHALINI CHUGH & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

GARDENIA AIMS DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only CA D No.11329 of 2024 is listed under this item ) WITH Diary No(s). 11329/2024 (XVII-A) ( IA No.92685/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date : 11-07-2024 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Mr. Manish Tiwari , AOR Mr. Manish Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Rk Tanwar, Adv. Mr. Nihar Ranjan Singh, Adv. Mr. Rs Janwa, Adv. Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR Mr. Pardeep Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Joshi, Adv. Ms. Shalini Dhingra, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Diary No(s). 11329/2024

As per office report, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to file sufficient number of spare copies. However, ld. counsel, Mr Rishi K Awasthi appearing on behalf of Mr Punit Vinay, Advocate-on-record undertakes to Digitally signed by VARSHA MENDIRATTA Date: 2024.07.13 12:19:24 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Contd…

Item no.85

appear for respondent no.1 and seeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks time.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that except respondent no.1, remaining respondents need not be served and the same are going to be deleted. Application be filed within two weeks. If filed, process the same for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. However, if the application is not filed within the time granted, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers as sufficient spare copies have not been filed.

SUJATA SINGH Registrar

HJ